Flat Earth conceptions of what constitutes “gravity”, such as the Obligate Tendency, offer both fresh and compelling analyses of the question. So when you hear Flat Earth Theorists saying things like “ the sun, moon, and planets are smaller and closer to the surface of the Earth” remember that we are going where our senses lead us, rather than stubbornly patching the holes of a failing methodological system. Science fills its gaping theoretical holes with open speculation and presumption. The utter paucity of well thought explanation represents one of the hallmarks of mainstream science. Their silence is the most compelling answer you will ever get. “Why?” you the thoughtful observer might ask. Essentially, the world’s greatest minds can’t come up with anything better than “ big object make big pull“. ![]() To this day, physicists do not understand why mass would induce gravitational forces in the first place. No rational or observational data exists that can explain the most basic assumptions of Gravitational Theory. They even claim planetary orbits are caused by the gravitational “pull” of the sun itself, which results from the sun’s mass. Under the heliocentric model, spherists envision the sun as a massive ball of fire, with the several planets radiating outward and orbiting around it. Perspective (relative to you the viewer on Earth) determines how celestial bodies appear.įor ages, mainstream science has assumed that vast distances interpose between Earth and objects in space. The sun, moon, planets, and stars are all smaller and orbit above its surface. Question: “ So how does an “orbit” even work in the Flat Earth Model?”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |